Sure, there are a few small things I see that slightly different treatments of a small number of final edits, but overall, it looks like it’d be somewhat redundant to have both editors, to say nothing for the additional $150. Still, as such, I was looking at The Nik Collection, and that is what this question is regarding.Īfter looking at all the information, and watching a number of the tools that are contained therein, as well as a few You Tube Webinar videos, I am getting the idea that pretty much, The Nik Collection offers all the same bases, albeit in a more roundabout way, which are ultimately covered by PL 5 Elite in combo with FP 6 Elite. So for you, (and anyone else reading this) an extra question … First, I am quite pleased with DXO PL5 and all that it has to offer. Then I can easily press the Compare button, as described by to see what difference I have made between versions. colour and B&W, or a different colour temperature or other effect. I have several images, for which I have multiple VCs, which are either experimental or finished different versions - e.g. This means that I can create a new VC, either from the untouched Master, or from a version I have already worked on, thus giving me a “snapshot” of the work I have done so far, in case I want to easily back out to a previous version. How to export to Affinity Photo 2 DeepPRIME and DeepPRIME XD hardware acceleration further information. Ive changed my standard preset, but DxO PhotoLab seems to ignore it. My personal procedure is to make a VC before doing any edits at all and work on that VC. After processing my files, they seem to show distortion. Otherwise it behaves in the same way as any other VC, apart from, if you attempt to delete it, it also removes all other VCs and the file from disk, whereas deleting a VC only removes the list of changes for that particular VC from the DOP file. A Master is only really a Virtual Copy that is marked with an ‘M’ because it is the first (implicit) Virtual Copy of the file on disk. In Lightroom I could easily treat the two files with the same. Typically I shoot jpg and raw at the same time. Careful here the preview for DJI DNG files is only 970 x 720 pixels the DXO DNG preview is the full size of the image, so no material difference in size of the RAW data compared to the. All DNGs have a built in jpeg preview file. As we've said before (April 2008), and the Pop Photo Lab confirms. Resetting either the Master or a VC simply wipes out all the changes you have made to that particular version from the DOP file.Īs has pointed out, there is very little point in resetting the Master. Hi, I’m still using Lightroom for most of my work, but use DxO PL for special lighting conditions because of it’s superior Prime denoising. Using DXO Pure Raw or Photolab Elite will give you a clearer, less noisey DNG file than the Standard DJI DNG. Tested as Highest-quality JPEGs at default setting - 1. PhotoLab is a non-destructive editor, which means that all changes are saved into a list of parameters, which are key in a sidecar file with a DOP extension. You need to realise, whatever you do, you are never editing the original file. So, to be sure … I can edit the Original to my hearts delight
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |